AS THE ‘GINGER NINJA’ GOES DOWN THAILAND HAS REASON TO CELEBRATE-
All is not lost. Thailand politically may be going down the pan but British drugs traffickers give it the thumbs up. They have not put it toa formal vote but that is the way it’s beginning to look by scanning the U.K.
press.
“Detective Inspector Craig Jackson from South Yorkshire Police, who led the investigation, said:
‘Craig Allen is a sophisticated and determined drug trafficker who was directly responsible for the supply of Class A drugs onto the streets of South Yorkshire and across the UK.
‘Much of Allen’s criminality was orchestrated from Thailand and the Netherlands and was undertaken by his UK-based co-defendants in a highly organised manner.
‘He thought he was above the law, untouchable, and operating in a jurisdiction like Thailand gave him a degree of anonymity.
‘But South Yorkshire and England will be safer places with Allen behind bars, there is no doubt”.
It’s nice to know that Sheffield and South Yorkshire will be safer.
Oxley’s wife Janpen was arrested along with the alleged gunman and his accomplices. The gunman confessed and co-operated with enquiries and he was the only one to be refused bail.
Three years on it is still in the courts and Oxley’s wife is of course out on bail.
![]() |
| DPA story from ‘The Nation’ |
![]() |
| Whacky and friends |
Mr Justice Simon, sitting in London, granted a Recovery Order against Arran Coghlan, under the 2002 Proceeds of Crime Act.
The judge was ruling in a claim for civil recovery by the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) in relation to the converted chapel on Brook Lane, reported to be worth £2m, which is the home of Coghlan and his partner Claire Burgoyne.
The judge said Coghlan, 40, denied he had ever been a drug dealer, “although he accepted that he had engaged in loan-sharking in the relevant periods”.
But the judge said he was satisfied from the evidence that between 1999 and at least April 2004, “Mr Coghlan was engaged in unlawful conduct as a drug dealer and that his drug dealing was the source of his income”.
![]() |
| Arran. Did SOCA leaving him crying in the chapel? |
Mr Justice Simon said: “It is SOCA’s case that Mr Coghlan’s interest in the Chapel is recoverable property because it was acquired directly or indirectly with the proceeds of unlawful conduct (drug dealing) during a period when he had no, or no sufficient, lawful income to acquire it.”
He said: “SOCA submitted that Mr Coghlan was at the head of a large-scale and profitable drug-dealing enterprise in Stockport from 1997/98 to 2003/04 and had no declared income during this period; and, although he was employed from 2004/05 to 2005/06 he was paid less than £30,000 per annum in those two years.”
That translates locally – Better than ten guilty persons who can pay their legal bills escape justice than an innocent man (who cannot) goes to jail.”
![]() |
| Jason, formerly a AA category prisoner for armed robbery |







